Why can't we delete finalized invoices and transactions instead of reversing them? "Reversals" lead to so many unnecessary transactions being created on the ledger when one is learning to navigate a very complicated system.

Hi @Rosemarie Moyeno Matos (Law Office of Rosemarie Moyeno Matos LLC)​ 

Thank you for posting on LEAP Community Discussions.

We suggest reversing a transaction rather than deleting it. That is so the transaction doesn't affect your account balances or reports, but also so you can always have a record of it. Having a record of all transactions is a key part of good accounting. I would suggest posting this to our ideas hub here.

If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to reach the Helpdesk by clicking the orange Support button in the lower right-hand corner of any window in the LEAP Community.  

We hope you find this helpful!

Kind regards,

Shaiefa

I agree. There should be a way to delete unapproved invoices if they did not print during the billing cycle, so they don't keep showing up on lists. Also, when reprinting an invoice, it should not add new invoices to the total outstanding invoices. If the invoice date you printed is 05/02/21....and you print that invoice send it to client, there should be a way to look at that particular invoice just like it was when the client received it. Having to print and then saving all invoices into Word is a whole separate step.

I completely agree. We should not have to delete them, but it is the only way to remove them from the list. If you enter additional timeslips and then run the create invoice, it does not pick up any previous timeslips that have not been billed. I don't want to send several invoices to the client at once, when it could all be listed on one invoice. You are forced to delete the unbilled invoices in order to do one transaction.

Also, there should be a way that if the invoice did not print, you can mark a list to removed the unbilled invoices.